🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.