Skip to content
Saturday, October 10, 2026
Plainly Topics

Tetris Didn't Win at This Gaming Ceremony — A New Category Could Fix That

As any prominent prize-giving event draws close, you'll find a clamor for the addition additional classifications to recognize underappreciated efforts and satisfy the spirits of fans with niche passions.

Another commentator made the case supporting a scary games classification. That would be fantastic. Equally deserving are strategy board titles, this being someone's personal cause. However, I must insist if I try to elbow in front since similar to single-minded supporters, I have a cast-iron argument backing this proposal remains most pressing and significant. This is the request: We need an award type for logic-based games.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Categorizing art by genre defies precise measurement; opinions vary greatly, and it will always start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why cinema institutions don’t do it. However, it represents an essential concession for the industry of gaming, which are so diverse they hardly constitute one unified medium.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of achievement in video games to gain proper attention, and for games of all stripes to receive proper recognition, genre categories are essential.

Existing Game Classification System

Prominent interactive entertainment events offer these genre categories for Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these award types successfully include a lot of ground, making space possible accommodating various experiences.

Not so for brain-teasing titles. No suitable classification appears to put them. Examine these examples from this year’s best games, all very different: structural challenges from a specific release, intense tile-matching from another release, engaging interpersonal challenges in another game. What category would fit them between these six categories? Simply put, no category fits.

The Representation Problem

There are dozens of brilliant puzzle games launched regularly lacking appropriate categories during gaming ceremonies, except when they manage to fit classification types such as Mobile Game, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.

  • One classic puzzle game got overlooked for anything in 2014
  • Another imaginative release received no nominations during that ceremony
  • A beloved organization game was overlooked in 2021
  • Limited numbers of logic titles managed to sneak into niche award types

Importance of Logic Titles

These are often small games, yet the craft of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games count as most popular titles in the world continuing this trend for an extended period.

The famous puzzle experience challenges well-known building titles for the title of most purchased experience; it also contends for top gaming experience. Logic titles represent cornerstones within interactive entertainment, while interacting across multiple categories.

The Solution and Justification

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter this problem. One could readily select five nominees interesting, varied, worthy titles each ceremony simply — actually, with challenge, because you’d have to leave numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these include experiences without proper classification during prominent ceremonies. Logic title developers function at the demanding boundary of video game design, producing among most fundamental forms of the video game form. Comparable to cinema stunt performers, they warrant appreciation. We shouldn't delay 35 years.

About the author

Michael Burns

Maya Chen is a freelance journalist and cultural commentator with a background in sociology, exploring how societal shifts impact everyday life.

Plainly Topics

Type to search articles.